By: Webb, Stokes & Sparks
Railroad accidents in and around San Angelo can cause devastating injuries and loss of life. Liability in these cases is often complex, involving federal railroad regulations, Texas personal injury law, and—when railroad workers are injured—special federal statutes.
Understanding how liability is analyzed helps injured individuals and families recognize why railroad accident cases require careful investigation and experienced legal representation.
Railroad accidents are not handled like typical personal injury claims. One of the biggest reasons is federal oversight. The railroad industry is heavily regulated at the federal level, particularly by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). These regulations can influence what claims may be brought and how fault is evaluated.
At the same time, Texas law still plays a major role—especially when accidents involve drivers, pedestrians, or property owners near railroad tracks.
Two threshold questions usually shape liability from the outset:
The answers determine which laws apply and which parties may be responsible.
Railroad incidents in West Texas often fall into several recurring categories. Each raises different liability considerations.
Collisions at highway–rail grade crossings are among the most serious railroad accidents. These crashes often involve passenger vehicles, commercial trucks, or pedestrians struck by a train.
Liability may depend on issues such as:
Because some crossing safety measures are governed by federal regulations, certain claims may be limited by federal law, while others remain available under Texas negligence principles.
Derailments can occur due to:
These incidents may injure train crews, motorists near the tracks, or residents and businesses close to the derailment site. Investigations often focus on maintenance records, inspection practices, and whether safety rules were followed.
Railroad employees face unique hazards, including:
Unlike most workers in Texas, railroad employees are generally not covered by standard workers’ compensation systems. Instead, many on-the-job railroad injuries are governed by a federal statute known as the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA).
Some cases involve pedestrians or others injured while on or near railroad property. These claims can raise questions about:
These cases are highly fact-specific and often depend on location, prior incidents, and railroad practices.
When a railroad employee is injured at work, liability is often analyzed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). Enacted in 1908, FELA allows railroad workers to seek compensation when a railroad’s negligence played a role in causing an injury.
Unlike traditional workers’ compensation systems:
To establish liability under FELA, an injured worker typically must show that the railroad failed to provide a reasonably safe work environment. This may involve unsafe equipment, inadequate training, poor maintenance, or unsafe work practices.
FELA claims are subject to a three-year statute of limitations, making early investigation and documentation especially important.
When railroad accidents injure drivers, pedestrians, or others not employed by the railroad, Texas personal injury law often applies.
Under Texas negligence principles, liability generally requires proof of:
Railroad companies may owe duties related to:
Texas also applies a comparative responsibility system. This means fault may be allocated among multiple parties, and a claimant’s recovery can be reduced if they are found partially responsible.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of railroad accident litigation is federal preemption.
In some circumstances, federal law can limit or preempt certain state-law claims—particularly those involving:
Courts have held that when federal regulations “cover” a specific safety issue, some state-law claims may be restricted. This does not mean railroads are immune from liability. Instead, it means that the legal theory must fit within the boundaries allowed by federal law.
Understanding preemption requires careful analysis of:
Tragically, some railroad accidents result in fatalities. In Texas, wrongful death and survival claims are governed by state statutes and allow certain family members to seek compensation for losses arising from a loved one’s death.
These claims may arise from:
Texas generally imposes a two-year statute of limitations on wrongful death claims, making timely evaluation essential.
Railroad accident cases demand a law firm that understands both Texas personal injury law and the federal regulations governing railroads. At Webb, Stokes & Sparks, the firm represents individuals and families harmed by serious accidents, including complex railroad injury claims.
Our practice focuses on:
Railroad accidents in San Angelo present unique legal challenges. Whether the incident involves a crossing collision, a derailment, or a railroad worker injury, liability often hinges on a careful analysis of federal statutes, safety regulations, and Texas negligence law. Understanding how these elements interact helps injured individuals and families recognize why railroad accident cases require focused attention and experienced legal representation.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance tailored to your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a railroad accident, Webb, Stokes & Sparks can help you understand your legal options and the process involved. To speak with the firm, contact them at (325) 442-0711 or visit our contact page.
“
314 W Harris Ave
San Angelo, TX 76903